B-man, your secrets out.

  • Eelpoutguy
    Farmington, Outing
    Posts: 10779
    #2303135

    Once-rare lake trout in Lake Superior are doing so well that state biologists will use the fish to stock the species in lakes around the state, officials have announced.

    This fall, the Department of Natural Resources successfully harvested lake trout eggs from fish captured in two nets set along the North Shore just north of Duluth. Crews transported 18 male-female pairs to the DNR work station at the French River, stripping them of eggs and milt. The fish were then returned to the lake.

    Cory Goldsworthy, DNR Lake Superior fisheries supervisor, said the trial has given the agency confidence to vacate its previous and less efficient lake trout stocking routine. For about 20 years, crews have taken long trips each fall to Mountain Lake — a deep-water inland lake on the Canadian border — to net the fish needed to fulfill Minnesota’s lake trout stocking needs.

    The change, starting next fall, will be historic because lake trout in Lake Superior were ready to collapse in the early 1960s from over-fishing and devastation from the invasive sea lamprey. Joint efforts by conservation partners throughout the Great Lakes culminated around 2017 with full revival of the species and a return to commercial fishing of the species in Minnesota waters.

    “It’s kind of a good story to tell,’’ Goldsworthy said this week. “We busted our butts to rehabilitate lake trout in Lake Superior and now the population is doing so well we are using those adult fish for inland stocking programs.’’

    The news about capitalizing on the turnaround of lake trout in Lake Superior coincides with the opening of the annual sport fishing season. Opening day was Sunday in the Minnesota and Wisconsin waters of the big lake, and the season runs into October of next year. The Minnesota daily bag limit on Lake Superior is three lake trout of any size. Inland lake trout fishing in Minnesota opens Dec. 30 for lakes entirely inside the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. For other inland lakes, the season opens Jan. 13. All inland fishing of lake trout in Minnesota ends March 31.

    Goldsworthy said the comeback of lake trout along the North Shore and elsewhere in Lake Superior has proven durable, buoyed most recently by a giant boom in lake herring, also called cisco, a key forage species. The 2022 population boom in ciscoes should provide stable nutrition for lake trout for another 20 years, Goldsworthy said.

    The state halted the stocking of lake trout into Lake Superior in 2015 because natural reproduction was doing so well. By now, at least 98% of the population is wild, or naturally produced. In 1980, only 6% of the population was wild.

    In the most recent annual fisheries report for the Minnesota waters of Lake Superior, the DNR recorded a catch of 16.6 lake trout per 1,000 feet of net in the fall of 2023. That was the fourth-best catch in the previous 10 years. The same survey recorded the highest number of juvenile lake trout netted since 2005 – another sign of strength.

    Paula Phelps, the DNR’s fish production supervisor, said tapping Lake Superior for the gametes needed to raise baby lake trout would ideally allow the system to discontinue keeping adult broodstock on hand in the Peterson State Fish Hatchery in southeastern Minnesota.

    She said it’s too early to say how many fingerlings and yearlings can be raised in the hatchery each year with the new method. But initially, the plan calls for the North Shore crew to produce enough fertilized lake trout eggs to stock the seven inland lakes currently in the DNR’s rotation. The eggs will be transported to the Peterson hatchery for raising.

    Additional lake trout stocking could be achieved, Phelps said, if the Lake Superior strain of lake trout proves successful within the hatchery system and resilient in lakes. She said the Mountain Lake strain of lake trout in use now has failed to thrive in some stocked lakes.

    “It could expand the number of lakes to be stocked,’’ Phelps said. “That’s the hope.’’

    Currently, the DNR stocks seven Minnesota lakes with lake trout. They are Pennington Mine, Sagamore Mine and Big Trout Lake in the greater Brainerd area, Little Trout and Gun lakes near International Falls, Grindstone Lake in the Hinckley area and Iron Chief Complex near Buhl.

    B-man
    Posts: 6212
    #2303147

    Dang it, thought I had the lake to myself mrgreen

    I think I saw one of the nets they had out in October in Burlington Bay.

    Overall Minnesota sucks when it comes to Lake Superior.

    They don’t stock even a single fingerling. You have to buy a trout stamp to fish it, but not a single penny goes to stocking.

    It’s true the lake no longer needs help with lake trout, but I wish they’d dump in Browns, Kings, Steelhead, Splake, etc.

    Thankfully ALL of their neighbors spend license money doing so (Wisconsin, Ontario, Michigan). Those bonus fish are a lot of fun!!!

    Ripjiggen
    Posts: 12168
    #2303150

    And just when I was going to say Kudos to the DNR B-man ruins it. rotflol

    BigWerm
    SW Metro
    Posts: 12133
    #2303152

    They don’t stock even a single fingerling. You have to buy a trout stamp to fish it, but not a single penny goes to stocking.

    It’s true the lake no longer needs help with lake trout, but I wish they’d dump in Browns, Kings, Steelhead, Splake, etc.

    Thankfully ALL of their neighbors spend license money doing so (Wisconsin, Ontario, Michigan). Those bonus fish are a lot of fun!!!

    I just heard this recently and it blew my mind that they don’t stock at all, and in particular have a policy against stocking non-native fish (salmon etc.). Only the MN DNR! It’s like banning peeing in the MN portion, and expecting there to be no pee… doah rotflol

    KPE
    River Falls, WI
    Posts: 1739
    #2303153

    We went out to Superior for a day on a charter in June and hammered lakers while searching for cohos. I’m not mad, they fight good, eat good, and we had a blast!

    tswoboda
    Posts: 8835
    #2303158

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>B-man wrote:</div>
    They don’t stock even a single fingerling. You have to buy a trout stamp to fish it, but not a single penny goes to stocking.

    It’s true the lake no longer needs help with lake trout, but I wish they’d dump in Browns, Kings, Steelhead, Splake, etc.

    Thankfully ALL of their neighbors spend license money doing so (Wisconsin, Ontario, Michigan). Those bonus fish are a lot of fun!!!

    I just heard this recently and it blew my mind that they don’t stock at all, and in particular have a policy against stocking non-native fish (salmon etc.). Only the MN DNR! It’s like banning peeing in the MN portion, and expecting there to be no pee… doah rotflol

    They’re stocking steelhead – 139,000 fingerlings in 2024

    tswoboda
    Posts: 8835
    #2303161

    The steelhead stocking replaced the looper program so started about 5 years ago, or whenever they quit stocking loopers

    B-man
    Posts: 6212
    #2303168

    The steelhead stocking replaced the looper program so started about 5 years ago, or whenever they quit stocking loopers

    Where can I find how many they’ve put in each year?

    When I search the stocking data for Superior nothing comes up?

    suzuki
    Woodbury, Mn
    Posts: 18805
    #2303170

    Now do Coasters.

    fishthumper
    Sartell, MN.
    Posts: 12325
    #2303175

    It’s true the lake no longer needs help with lake trout, but I wish they’d dump in Browns, Kings, Steelhead, Splake, etc.

    Thankfully ALL of their neighbors spend license money doing so (Wisconsin, Ontario, Michigan). Those bonus fish are a lot of fun!!!

    Wisc. says Minnesota can keep those oil cans in their Big lake. We prefer out Kings and other trout. Most guides in Wisc. look down at the Lake Trout. They are their Bonus fish

    Gopherhawk
    Posts: 82
    #2303178

    Yup, just big, oily cans. I’ll keep ’em all outta that cold water.

    Randy Wieland
    Lebanon. WI
    Posts: 13709
    #2303180

    Hey, don’t knock lakers. Very much like crude oil and gas – a 50 gallon gallon drum of lakers can produce a few gallons of fish oil for trapping. Da coons love it.

    Snake ii’s
    Posts: 533
    #2303184

    I fished Mountain lake in the late 70’s. Worth the trip.

    gim
    Plymouth, MN
    Posts: 18284
    #2303187

    What a great success story. The entire Great Lakes were nearly wiped out of salmonids due the sea lamprey.

    tswoboda
    Posts: 8835
    #2303211

    Where can I find how many they’ve put in each year?

    No idea. Here’s a quick search of the DNR stocking in St Louis County circa 2019. They quit rearing loopers in 2018 so I assume these “rainbow trout” put in the Lester and French should all be “wild steelhead”

    Attachments:
    1. Screenshot-2024-12-05-142137.jpg

    BigWerm
    SW Metro
    Posts: 12133
    #2303232

    I’m not mad, they fight good, eat good, and we had a blast!

    I agree 100%, Lakers are a ton of fun to catch and great to eat or smoke and then eat.

    gim
    Plymouth, MN
    Posts: 18284
    #2303262

    Hey B man, I receive In Fisherman monthly and the one that showed up 2 days ago has you in it. On page 12 under “Adventures” in Crow Lake Ontario, I think there is a photo of you holding a decent lake trout.

    I took a photo of it with my phone. Is it you? I think you’re a minor celebrity in the lake trout realm.

    Attachments:
    1. IMG_4216.jpg

    LabDaddy1
    Posts: 2626
    #2303270

    Nice. I’ve fished crow out of Muskie bay resort yearsssss ago

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 945
    #2303274

    Tswoboda is right the plan is to continue to stock steelhead and this started when the looper program ended. That’s great and all but those fish primarily only benefit the stream fisherman. I really wish they would stock some kings, browns and splake. Kings make the most sense with the cold MN waters.

    Bearcat89
    North branch, mn
    Posts: 21192
    #2303276

    Hey B man, I receive In Fisherman monthly and the one that showed up 2 days ago has you in it. On page 12 under “Adventures” in Crow Lake Ontario, I think there is a photo of you holding a decent lake trout.

    I took a photo of it with my phone. Is it you? I think you’re a minor celebrity in the lake trout realm.

    Yup that’s him, I can spot Brandon from 2 miles away

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 945
    #2303277

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>B-man wrote:</div>
    It’s true the lake no longer needs help with lake trout, but I wish they’d dump in Browns, Kings, Steelhead, Splake, etc.

    Thankfully ALL of their neighbors spend license money doing so (Wisconsin, Ontario, Michigan). Those bonus fish are a lot of fun!!!

    Wisc. says Minnesota can keep those oil cans in their Big lake. We prefer out Kings and other trout. Most guides in Wisc. look down at the Lake Trout. They are their Bonus fish

    Which guides in WI look down on lakers in lake superior? I know several of the guides in wi pretty well and don’t know a single one that has that attitude.

    Maybe you are referring to Lake Michigan? If that’s the case, all I can say is all the fish taste like trash out of Michigan due to the alewife diet. My opinion of course. I don’t even like them smoked.

    gim
    Plymouth, MN
    Posts: 18284
    #2303282

    Yup that’s him, I can spot Brandon from 2 miles away

    Nice. I thought so but wasn’t 100% sure. peace

    Deuces
    Posts: 5282
    #2303286

    Anyone can stock whatever they want in there but if the forage isn’t there what would it matter?

    In your fellas opinion is the lakes forage base currently able to handle more fish in the system?

    B-man
    Posts: 6212
    #2303303

    Holy $hit I’m infamous jester

    Headed back up there this winter with a group of great guys. It can be a difficult bite, but the camaraderie and host are great toast

    FinnyDinDin
    Posts: 945
    #2303305

    In your fellas opinion is the lakes forage base currently able to handle more fish in the system?

    Definitely. Especially so with the huge herring hatch.

    Fortunately fish swim and they know no boundaries so lots of stocked fish from WI and Canada get caught in MN. And that includes stocked lake trout that come from WI. Just think how good it could be if MN chipped in.

    It’s not just lake superior stocking where the MNDNR is slacking. MN stocking program is a joke for most species when you compare them to WI.

    Deuces
    Posts: 5282
    #2303307

    Good to know toast

    tswoboda
    Posts: 8835
    #2303661

    B-Man here’s a little more info on steelhead stocking. The timing of the post is so perfect that maybe you already got the info

    Attachments:
    1. Screenshot_20241207_203734_Facebook.jpg

    2. Screenshot_20241207_203725_Facebook.jpg

    3. Screenshot_20241207_203705_Facebook.jpg

    Greenhorn
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts: 606
    #2303668

    It’s not just lake superior stocking where the MNDNR is slacking. MN stocking program is a joke for most species when you compare them to WI.

    Even compared to the Dakotas

Viewing 29 posts - 1 through 29 (of 29 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.