Hind Sight?

  • Besox
    Posts: 590
    #197061

    Is anyone using one of these sights that can give a thumbs up or down? I really like the idea but want to hear from a user before I make the leap.

    whitetails4ever
    Rochester, MN
    Posts: 756
    #85632

    I’ve shot the Anchor Site by Archery Innovations for 4 years now. I love it, just one more point of reference to make sure you’re doing the same thing everytime you pull back.

    Brad Juaire
    Maple Grove, MN
    Posts: 6101
    #65257

    Quote:


    I’ve shot the Anchor Site by Archery Innovations for 4 years now. I love it, just one more point of reference to make sure you’re doing the same thing everytime you pull back.


    X 2!

    eye-full
    Waterloo,Ia,USA
    Posts: 660
    #61251

    I had the Timberline No-Peep. It helped with form and that but for hunting I didn’t like it. It was distracting to me and not as fast as a peep. Also I can shoot in less light with a peep. I am also more consistent with the peep.

    The NO-Peep did help show me form flaws and works great for some but just wasn’t my piece of cake. I would pick one of the No-peep type before the Hind Sight IMHO though.

    Tom Miranda shoots the Hind Sight and I don’t know if it’s him or the sight but he doesn’t seem very consistent to me. But hey see if a shop or Cabelas would let you try it first to see how it works for you. Just my 2 cents or maybe 1.

    Besox
    Posts: 590
    #61930

    Thanks for the info!!

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.