Anglers Surpass Mille Lacs Walleye Quota; Season To Remain Open

  • steve-fellegy
    Resides on the North Shores of Mille Lacs--guiding on Farm Island these days
    Posts: 1294
    #1633868

    And now THIS dated from this past Thursday–She might want to add here that when they originally filed the “rights” case against the state …they said they wanted around 2 dozen walleyes per year for “ceremonial purposes”. That 2 dozen grew to 71 tons a year….So Dear Melanie–maybe look in the mirror!!

    “Melanie Benjamin
    August 11 at 8:36pm ·

    A MESSAGE TO BAND MEMBERS:

    Aaniin, This seems to be the summer of broken promises made to the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe. First, the County broke our law enforcement agreement, and so far, the State of Minnesota has turned a blind eye to this public safety crisis. Now, the State of Minnesota has broken its agreement on the ogaa (walleye) harvest for the second year in a row,…and has asked for our understanding.

    This matter was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. In the State’s disregard for a federal court order, what happens next will be determined collectively by us and all the impacted Bands.

    The State’s allocation for 2016 was 28,600 pounds and the Band allocation was 11,400 pounds. As responsible stewards of the resource and out of concern for the ogaa, the Bands have remained under our allocation. As requested by our Drum Keepers and Elders, all of the Bands have sacrificed greatly in taking much less than our communities need. The State, however, has not exercised the same restraint, going over its allocation by at least 10,000 pounds, and maybe more. And they are not stopping.

    While the Mille Lacs Band depends on the lake more so than the other Bands, this issue also affects Fond du Lac and the Wisconsin Bands. Our Band and Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission (GLIFWC) biologists and scientists are hard at work analyzing the State’s calculations and scrutinizing the basis for their decision to keep the lake open. Preliminary indications are that politics played a bigger role than science — or concern for future generations — in the State’s decision to violate the court order and leave the lake open.

    Our foremost concern is protecting the ogaa for future generations and protecting your rights as Band Members. Our attorneys who have represented the Band on our treaty rights litigation for the past 30 years – and who won that case in the U.S. Supreme Court – are working closely with GLIFWC and attorneys from other Bands to determine our best legal options to protect the lake and our rights.

    As has been our history, the Band has kept our promise. But in violation of the court order, the promise was broken on the other side. We will do whatever we must to ensure the ogaa are protected for generations to come.

    Someone needs to protect the lake. The Mille Lacs Band will certainly do so. I know that we can count on the other Bands to stand with us, even if the State chooses not to. As with our Treaties and our other rights, the Band will fight for justice, for our rights and for our future. Miigwech.

    Dutchboy
    Central Mn.
    Posts: 16650
    #1633875

    Thanks for the chuckle Steve.

    roosterrouster
    Inactive
    The "IGH"...
    Posts: 2092
    #1633884

    I knew I shouldn’t have read that to start my day…

    Wally fry
    Posts: 4
    #1633956

    The dnr needs to get the hooking mortality facts right
    There is no way that many fish have died by hooking mortality.
    If this is true the non band harvest has not been met and there would be no reason for everyone to be worked up.
    All of you anglers know that there have not been many dead walleye this summer
    The people who are on the lake everyday can provide all the information the dnr needs to know about the status of the fishery.
    I think we all know that if you put any wild creature in a cage for five days without food that some will die hooking mortality or not.
    I only saw one dead walleye in 6 hours of fishing over three days last weekend.
    Not sure where this thing is headed now.
    Do we really need to test net the lake every spring and fall
    How many fish are killed in this Process and does the band and the dnr d other do this?

    Dutchboy
    Central Mn.
    Posts: 16650
    #1633957

    The bands stated goal is to reclaim the shores of Mille Lacs lake. Just how does a healthy economy & fishery assist in attaining those goals?

    Walleyestudent Andy Cox
    Garrison MN-Mille Lacs
    Posts: 4484
    #1634008

    The bands stated goal is to reclaim the shores of Mille Lacs lake. Just how does a healthy economy & fishery assist in attaining those goals?

    So this is what we need?

    Edit: I’m just getting weary of this conflict!

    Attachments:
    1. The-Indian-Fighter-1955-FilmAffinity.jpg

    MNdrifter
    Posts: 1671
    #1634016

    Edit: I’m just getting weary of this conflict!
    [/quote]

    I think we are about to see the beginning of an epic court battle where the only one who wins is the big buck lawyers.

    Walleyestudent Andy Cox
    Garrison MN-Mille Lacs
    Posts: 4484
    #1634037

    Edit: I’m just getting weary of this conflict!

    I think we are about to see the beginning of an epic court battle where the only one who wins is the big buck lawyers.
    [/quote]
    Yes, and we won’t have to wait too long. Soon the DNR and GLIWC will begin meetings/discussions negotiating the upcoming regs to take effect Dec. 1st. One can only imagine how that will go…:???:

    big_g
    Isle, MN
    Posts: 22450
    #1634199

    steve, they (natives) are starving right now…. from her words, they all are real skinny and withering away up there. crazy (they have consumed 11,400 pounds and the rest of the states anglers have consumed ZERO) if her letter wasn’t so stupid, I would laugh.

    steve-fellegy
    Resides on the North Shores of Mille Lacs--guiding on Farm Island these days
    Posts: 1294
    #1634599

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>MNdrifter wrote:</div>
    I think we are about to see the beginning of an epic court battle where the only one who wins is the big buck lawyers.

    The wheels are already starting to turn…from today’s Strib

    http://www.startribune.com/mille-lacs-band-ponders-suit-over-walleye-decision/390380831/

    Bring it to court! Let’s finally show that it is a CONSERVATION issue to gill- net during the spawn. Let’s finally show to the court’s that “subsistence needs”, which was the basis for the original treaty rights case, is a fraud.

    I hope this gets into court asap! Enough of this “selective sovereignty”/legalized racism in the 21st century in the U.S.
    “Tribal” is a third world, scenario! The U.S. is better than that…time to move out of the 17th century and into the real world.

    CaptainMusky
    Posts: 22718
    #1634737

    I’m not as optimistic as you that hastily taking this to court will yield favorable results.
    Judges won’t look at this other than a black and white interpretation. They won’t use judgement and say well those treaties were written a hundred years ago and you don’t need subsistence anymore, etc.
    The last court battle brought us to the current state. The next one could result in netting of more lakes and off reservation areas at that. They tested it already last Fall on Gull and Hole in the Day.

    belletaine
    Nevis, MN
    Posts: 5116
    #1634749

    There isn’t another outdoor situation/ lake that even comes close to evoking the passion, anger,emotion than Mille Lacs.
    People have zero confidence in anyone that is in any way part of the decision making process regarding the lake.

    One of the toughest businesses if not the toughest to succeed in is the restaurant business. And that’s the case for here in the big city. Now whittle that down to a cafe on the shores of Mille Lacs where your main customer base is fisherman, we’ll it’s gotta be damn tough and I’m sure they’re operating on thin margins. A lot of them are also maintaining launch boats and motel rooms/cabins. So to the guy who can live for 6 months without a paycheck good for you for saving but I don’t think that’s the case for the business owners on the lake.

    It’s a hot mess and there doesn’t seem to be a end in sight.

Viewing 13 posts - 61 through 73 (of 73 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.