None of those QB’s (all 4 of them) have won more than a playoff game at best.
Prescott is 2-5 in 7 playoff games.
Certainly not very good, but 2 is “more than a playoff game at best.”
Cousins is 1-4
Lawrence is 1-1
Love is 1-1
When I stated more accomplished, I wasn’t specifially just referring to the playoffs. I was referring to their careers as a whole.
<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>Tlazer wrote:</div>
None of those QB’s (all 4 of them) have won more than a playoff game at best.Prescott is 2-5 in 7 playoff games.
Certainly not very good, but 2 is “more than a playoff game at best.”
Cousins is 1-4
Lawrence is 1-1
Love is 1-1When I stated more accomplished, I wasn’t specifially just referring to the playoffs. I was referring to their careers as a whole.
My statement about a “playoff game at best”, was not the actual number of playoff games they won, it was a statement that none of them have taken their teams and won a Championship game or even played in the SB. But seeing how Cousin played for the Vikings, it’s easy to see why his playoff record is what it is. 
Maybe next time post what you mean. Not a blanket statement that means something else. The rest of us can’t read your mind. We can only read what you type. 
I’ll stand behind my statment that Prescott is a more accomplished quarterback than those other ones listed too. The data, stats, wins, playoff wins, etc whatever parameter you want to use backs that up too since none of them have won or played in a super bowl.
Whether he, Purdy, Love, Lawrence, or Cousins is worth the money they make at QB is certainly up for debate though.
Have to disagree with your comment about Prescott and Cousin’s being more accomplished than Love or Lawrence.
it was a statement that none of them have taken their teams and won a Championship game or even played in the SB.
None of the 4 have won a Championship game or SB, so not sure how you can use that to determine who’s more accomplished. Due to the overall lack of playoff success among all 4 the only even metric is regular season record: Trevor Lawrence is 21-35 as a starter. Jordan Love is 12-11. Kirk Cousins is 83-73-2. And Dak is 76-45. At this point it’s TBD if Lawrence or Love even get to start that many games in the NFL, let alone start playing good enough to reach the same winning %.
Accomplished? Love is kirk Cousins with uncle rico’s mustache.
“Hi CJ Stroud, sorry your WR’s are hurt but nonetheless welcome back.” -Earth
Arguably not one franchise QB or at least not one face of the league QB in these drafts. Some promise from the class of 24, but still to early to tell.
Trevor Lawrence is 22-36 as a starter. It’s hard to even consider him as one of the highlighted 3 in that entire list. CJ Stroud is fresh off an 11/31 night this week, and two weeks ago a 10/21 performance.
If anything, I think people will eventually realize that there was an “Era of the Quarterback” where we were absolutely spoiled by talent + wisdom…and now as a league we’re regressing back to the norm. The Brady, Manning, Rodgers, Brees days of being in the league together and being a near guaranteed 300 + 3TDs each week was something remarkable. Then add to that generation Ben Roethlisberger, Eli Manning, Phillip Rivers, and Matt Ryan……..and it really highlights a unique era.
Stroud is really struggling. After a breakout year last year I expected big things from him and the texans
Yeah, Stroud was my keeper in FFL and THANK GOD I finally gave up and benched him this week.
One thing I would be extremely interested in watching would be a TV show or series where some coaches, GM’s, and scouts go back to draft classes from a few years ago and go into detail about why a player didn’t work out in the NFL. They could review the pre-draft scouting reports and what everyone was saying and then follow their work through the NFL and explain what went wrong and how it went wrong.
Obviously this would be with the benefit of hindsight but I would be interested in hearing their perspective and see if there are any patterns, because there are no sure-fire things. I tend to favor prospects who play for great teams in big-time games (Georgia, Alabama, Ohio State, etc.) but then there are some obvious discrepancies there: Lewis Cene was a 1st-round pick from an absolutely dominant defense and barely saw the field in the NFL; what didn’t work? Josh Allen and Patrick Mahomes didn’t make it to any blue-chip, contending rosters in college and now they’re the talk of the NFL. What slipped by college recruiters but became more obvious to NFL draft scouts?
One additional note: I just went on about how unpredictable things are, yet I do feel like it almost never goes well when a highly-touted college prospect has traits that some people like but barely played, and my examples are Richardson and Trey Lance. I’m pretty astonished that NFL GM’s were willing to draft those two so high based on such a small sample size from college football.
I’m glad Hock is finally back. Fingers crossed it goes well for him. It was really tough watching Dobbs lost year. He was such a terrible passer. He would throw up a beach ball pass and you knew the receiver would be absolutely drilled upon landing after catching the ball. A lot of hospital passes by that guy.
Two turnovers have directly led to at least a short FG attempt lost and now a colts TD. Bradbury got manhandled on that sack and scoop TD too.
Not sure why they picked up the flag. He clearly threw it for a reason.
Good lord did Bradbury get trucked on that sack/turnerover…
Good lord we have a kicker problem again.
Love watching me some Prime-time Vikings 
Love watching me some Prime-time Vikings
don’t you need to go to bed! 
Woof – pretty tempted to shut off the TV.
Free 3!
Darnold starts the 3rd QTR on fire
Good lord we have a kicker problem again.
nah…
Whoa, a Dallas Turner sighting! Get that kid more snaps!
So why do we keep running directly into the “Triangle of Terror”?
<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>CaptainMusky wrote:</div>
Good lord we have a kicker problem again.nah…
Apparently he actually does have a hamstring issue. I have a feeling they won’t be attempting any more long FGs this game.
That Colts D has got to be getting worn out.
NO! you throw that ball to Oliver again. That would have been the knockout punch. Get them back on their heels and run it down their worn-out throats. So stupid!
Always amazes me how many unemployed NFL coaches & GM’s reside in little old IDO. 
That INT was on Darnold’s lack of situational awareness. The Vikes had the Colts right where they needed them to be and they let them off the hook and gave the Colts new life. The Colts don’t get that pick and the game is over.
Always amazes me how many unemployed NFL coaches & GM’s reside in little old IDO.
Too bad you can’t quote a quote anymore cuz this one aged well.
There’s only one team I like watching lose more than the Vikings….and that’s da Bears peace toast
The Packers are in 2nd place with a four game win streak, the Vikings in 3rd with a two game losing streak. Next week against the red hot Lions is going to be a tough one
IMG_1121.jpeg
For the most part an ugly game. But a win is a win.
Moving the ball on offense didn’t seem to be an issue. The issue was inability to finish drives with any points in the first half after a red zone INT and two missed FGs. That seemed to change in the second half.
Thought the defense played very well after getting manhandled the last two weeks. Granted, the Lions and Rams are better offensive teams than the Colts are too.
The aggressive play call late in the 4th to go for a TD instead of being conservative with a short FG was nice to see.
Three road games in a row now – at Jacksonville, at Tennessee, at Chicago.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
