2022 Minnesota Vikings

  • BigWerm
    SW Metro
    Posts: 11566
    #2171493

    I’ve also never understood why the Packers ‘true’ rivalry is with the Bears. I think the true rivalry is with the Vikings but they are too scared to admit it, because the Vikings actually beat them fairly often, even with Rodgers at QB. I know it goes back to long ago games/teams, but in the last 30 years the Packers are like 48-19 against the Bears. That’s not a rivalry, that’s complete ownership lol.

    Packers are 36-30-3 against in the Vikings in that same span. Pretty close!

    Totally agree, and most Packers fans do as well I think. They just say that as an insult to Vikes fans, and the fact the Bears and Packers are #1 and #2 in all time wins.

    Michael C. Winther
    Reedsburg, WI
    Posts: 1494
    #2171500

    the Bears were the bigger one, i suspect based on the long history. but even going back to the 90s I think it’s shifted to the the Vikings.

    i grew up in Green Bay, so when i was living in the Twin Cities i took my roommates for a visit and to catch a Vikings game at Lambeau. they asked if it was “safe” to wear their Vikings gear out to the bars on Saturday night. i just laughed and said, “Yes, it’s Green Bay.” they had a blast.

    i took my son to his first game at Lambeau this year, what a cool thing to be able to do. if you haven’t been, you owe it to yourself to go sometime regardless of who you cheer for. i caught plenty of games at the Metrodumb, but i haven’t yet been to the upgrade at USBank. i’m tentatively planning a road game with my son for next fall depending on the schedule.

    BigWerm
    SW Metro
    Posts: 11566
    #2171502

    i haven’t yet been to the upgrade at USBank. i’m tentatively planning a road game with my son for next fall depending on the schedule.

    You may need to start mentally preparing for having your own seat, 72 degrees, and indoor plumbing whistling rotflol

    Dan
    Southeast MN
    Posts: 3774
    #2171503

    i grew up in Green Bay, so when i was living in the Twin Cities i took my roommates for a visit and to catch a Vikings game at Lambeau. they asked if it was “safe” to wear their Vikings gear out to the bars on Saturday night. i just laughed and said, “Yes, it’s Green Bay.” they had a blast.

    i took my son to his first game at Lambeau this year, what a cool thing to be able to do. if you haven’t been, you owe it to yourself to go sometime regardless of who you cheer for. i caught plenty of games at the Metrodumb, but i haven’t yet been to the upgrade at USBank. i’m tentatively planning a road game with my son for next fall depending on the schedule.

    I’m a huge fan of my home state Vikings but I can admit that the Green Bay experience looks awesome. I’ve only been there once, for work this past summer, but everything looked awesome. Minnesota keeps dropping our nice new stadiums in the middle of the urban world and I don’t like it. In Green Bay you can see Lambeau for miles. Driving around the stadium there are just normal, single-family homes close by, and very few high buildings, so the stadium dominates the landscape. And drive about 3-5 minutes in any direction and you’ll find yourself a corn field. And when I was there in August there was big news to be had-a Hy-Vee was coming to town! Honestly I would much rather have the atmosphere and set-up that Green Bay has.

    David Anderson
    Dayton, MN
    Posts: 506
    #2171508

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>fishthumper wrote:</div>
    I’ve also never understood why the Packers ‘true’ rivalry is with the Bears. I think the true rivalry is with the Vikings but they are too scared to admit it, because the Vikings actually beat them fairly often, even with Rodgers at QB. I know it goes back to long ago games/teams, but in the last 30 years the Packers are like 48-19 against the Bears. That’s not a rivalry, that’s complete ownership lol.

    Packers are 36-30-3 against in the Vikings in that same span. Pretty close!

    The reason the Packers/Bears rivalry is because the Pack started in 1919 and the Bears in 1920. They have been playing each other for 40 years before the Vikings were even in existence. Also remember that 1/2 the games were played in Milwaukee until the Brewers go a new stadium, only 2 hours from Chicago.

    gimruis
    Plymouth, MN
    Posts: 17234
    #2171510

    Minnesota keeps dropping our nice new stadiums in the middle of the urban world and I don’t like it. In Green Bay you can see Lambeau for miles. Driving around the stadium there are just normal, single-family homes close by, and very few high buildings, so the stadium dominates the landscape.

    I was there in August a few years ago and took the hour long tour of the stadium for 10 bucks. So worth it. Just the history of the Packers and NFL football itself was worth the tour. Plus I got to walk out on to the field as well. Haven’t been to a game there. Sometime I will. Had a whitefish sandwich and a beer at Curly’s Pub after the tour.

    The location in seemingly the middle of a suburban neighborhood was the thing that stood out to me too. Its unlike any other professional sporting venue, maybe in the entire country. There’s houses right across the street from the stadium. That is very unique.

    KP
    Hudson, WI
    Posts: 1369
    #2171528

    I was at the game this past Sunday and there sure were a lot of Viking Fans. Also when you sit in club you get that 75 degrees and indoor plumbing haha! But both fans this past weekend were fun and we saw a lot of Viking Fans in the Title Town Distract the night before. What they have done around Lambeau is really something with the sledding hill, Skating rink, and shops. The Vikings really should have built out in Arden Hills and could of had something similar.

    gimruis
    Plymouth, MN
    Posts: 17234
    #2172013

    Another missed PAT. How does this continue to happen. Make a 61 yard FG as time expires and miss a 33 yd PAT.

    Bass Pundit
    8m S. of Platte/Sullivan Lakes, Minnesocold
    Posts: 1772
    #2172026

    Poor situational football to end the half. They called the final timeout a down too soon and then didn’t throw it into the endzone on the final play, thus leading to the bungled, rushed field-goal attempt.

    glenn57
    cold spring mn
    Posts: 11749
    #2172031

    Poor situational football to end the half. They called the final timeout a down too soon and then didn’t throw it into the endzone on the final play, thus leading to the bungled, rushed field-goal attempt.

    i aint complaining……it put minnow money in my pocket!!!!!! devil waytogo woot

    eyeguy507
    SE MN
    Posts: 5210
    #2172038

    Another missed PAT. How does this continue to happen. Make a 61 yard FG as time expires and miss a 33 yd PAT.

    meh…..he makes them when they matter!

    gimruis
    Plymouth, MN
    Posts: 17234
    #2172042

    Well 13-4 is certainly a lot better than I predicted. I had this team pegged at 10-7 as a wild card playoff team. Looks like the Bears will have the first overall pick in the draft.

    Unless the Cardinals pull off a miracle against the Niners, the Giants will be coming to Minneapolis in the wild card round next week.

    gimruis
    Plymouth, MN
    Posts: 17234
    #2172111

    As expected, the Vikings are the 3 seed in the NFC and will host the 6th seeded NY Giants on Sunday at 3:30pm. The opening line has the Vikings favored by 2.5 points. Just 15 days ago, the Vikings beat the Giants at US Bank Stadium 27-24 courtesy of a Greg Joseph 61 yd walk-off FG.

    The Giants mostly played their back ups yesterday against the Eagles, as they could not move up or down in the standings.

    BigWerm
    SW Metro
    Posts: 11566
    #2172154

    Solid boring performance yesterday to cement a great and very entertaining season! I don’t think anyone predicted 13 wins out of this squad. I think they handle the Giants at home, and can beat anyone on a given day. Sounds like Bradbury and Brandel both might be back for the playoffs which is a big step up from Reed and Udoh. I just don’t think we see a long run, but we are playing with house money at this point imo so let it rip! Kings of the North!

    mahtofire14
    Mahtomedi, MN
    Posts: 11036
    #2172246

    I’m not too concerned about the Giants either but with this team anything can happen. That being said I think they win and go on to the next round. If our D can show up even a little, they should be able to keep the Giants offense in check.

    If they win and move on Round 2 will be the big test.

    Steve Root
    South St. Paul, MN
    Posts: 5621
    #2172283

    Based on decades of observation…..

    Attachments:
    1. EBAA8412-FEEE-4B96-8263-026909A91B0B.jpeg

    Ripjiggen
    Posts: 11562
    #2172287

    In the last 25 years they have only lost in the first round 3 times. Just sayin…

    Now second round that’s a different story.

    gimruis
    Plymouth, MN
    Posts: 17234
    #2172298

    The last two appearances they have played and beaten the Saints, and then losing to the Eagles and 49ers.

    Back in 2015 was their last first round exit against Seattle. The Blair Walsh debacle.

    By no means are the Giants a push over. 16 days ago they were missing a couple of important defensive players, including their top cornerback who will likely be covering JJ this time. I foresee another close game. Hopefully sitting Zadarius last week gives him a burst of energy on the pass rush.

    glenn57
    cold spring mn
    Posts: 11749
    #2173142

    the so called “experts” sure dont seem the think the Vikings got much of a chance against the Giants???? doah

    BigWerm
    SW Metro
    Posts: 11566
    #2173149

    the so called “experts” sure dont seem the think the Vikings got much of a chance against the Giants???? doah

    Based off what? Here’s what the google said about the experts odds:
    Moneyline: Giants +160 (bet $100 to win $160) | Vikings -190 (bet $190 to win $100)
    Against the spread (ATS): Giants +3.5 (-110) | Vikings -3.5 (-110)

    glenn57
    cold spring mn
    Posts: 11749
    #2173153

    just what some of these are saying who is going to win the game. i have no clue how to interpet these odds…Moneyline you posted. doah

    Ripjiggen
    Posts: 11562
    #2173157

    It’s a sexy pic for the upset. Most of the other games won’t be very competitive.

    gimruis
    Plymouth, MN
    Posts: 17234
    #2173167

    On paper, the closest matchup is the Chargers/Jaguars game, followed by the Giants/Vikings.

    The Giants will be healthier this time around too. Their top cover cornerback did not play in the first game. He’ll be on JJ this time around.

    JEREMY
    BP
    Posts: 3866
    #2173292

    Just curious, is their top cover corner gonna cover JJ?

    gimruis
    Plymouth, MN
    Posts: 17234
    #2173295

    Per NBC Sports:

    The Giants could try to scheme up a dozen different ways to contain the NFL’s best receiver, but it would be a lot easier to just ask Adoree’ Jackson to handle the job.

    Jackson, who missed the final seven games of the regular season with a reported sprained MCL, was limited in Wednesday’s practice, as has been the case in recent weeks. After receiving extra attention from a trainer at the start of practice, the veteran cornerback said he is “not sure” if he will return Sunday to match up with the Vikings’ Justin Jefferson in the Giants’ wild-card contest, but safety Xavier McKinney provided a more encouraging forecast.

    “He’s going to be there, for sure,” McKinney laughed. “Even when me and Adoree’ are out there, they’re going to make plays on Sunday.”

    Jefferson toasted the Giants (mostly No. 2 cornerback Fabian Moreau) for 12 catches, 133 yards and a touchdown on Christmas Eve. McKinney also missed that game, a 27-24 loss, with a broken hand but since has returned.

    lindyrig79
    Forest Lake / Lake Mille Lacs
    Posts: 5789
    #2173459

    3rd string Center for the Vikes this weekend? Don’t like the sounds of that

    BigWerm
    SW Metro
    Posts: 11566
    #2173464

    3rd string Center for the Vikes this weekend? Don’t like the sounds of that

    Bradbury was a full participant yesterday, so I think he plays. Reed hasn’t been good, but it hasn’t been a dumpster fire either.

    Ripjiggen
    Posts: 11562
    #2173465

    I am more worried about the right tackle, but yes that center position is a little sketchy right now as well.

    I will be there win or lose I’m sure I’ll get a good buzz with the free booze.

    glenn57
    cold spring mn
    Posts: 11749
    #2173466

    meh……the vikes got this……..i hear EPG is shopping for a new chair as we speak!!!! peace waytogo woot

    there was an article written by someone on MSN today…….a bills vikings super bowl would be lights out!!!!!!!!

    Dan
    Southeast MN
    Posts: 3774
    #2173478

    I am more worried about the right tackle, but yes that center position is a little sketchy right now as well.

    I will be there win or lose I’m sure I’ll get a good buzz with the free booze.

    Because O’Neil doesn’t show up in the stat sheets I think a lot of people forget we’re missing one of the best tackles in football. Because of that and their bad defense my most sure fire prediction is that sometime this postseason Cousins gets massacred all day and internet experts will declare “see, Cousins can’t win a big game. “

Viewing 30 posts - 991 through 1,020 (of 1,219 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.