Just starting a new thread so the packer trolls have somewhere else to go.
IDO » Forums » Fishing Forums » General Discussion Forum » 2017 NFL packer draft
2017 NFL packer draft
-
bigpikePosts: 6259April 28, 2017 at 8:50 pm #1691269
Well if you didnt call our qb a douche bag loser I’m guessing the lines would be pulled up. If it makes you feel better read some of the great trolls from viking fans on last seasons packer threads. It works both ways.
April 28, 2017 at 9:08 pm #1691272Hey I’m entitled to my opinion and certainly entitled to give it on a Vikings thread. I think Aaron Rodgers is a tool, I really really dislike his stuck up personality. It has little to do with the team he plays for, I just don’t like the guy.
Tom SawvellInactivePosts: 9559April 28, 2017 at 10:30 pm #1691278Well he does have a new really good looking girl friend!
It would have been a dynamite picture had he stayed out of it and let the lady have her moment.
April 28, 2017 at 10:41 pm #1691279Well he does have a new really good looking girl friend!
Well which of the two is it? Or which of the three?
Attachments:
targamanInactiveWilton, WIPosts: 2759April 29, 2017 at 5:59 am #1691287I like the CB pick. Instant starter. Would have liked to see them take a RB but that can still happen
bigpikePosts: 6259April 29, 2017 at 6:57 am #1691290By the way crappie55369: Everything I learned about trolling I learned from Viking fans from this sight mostly the hard way, there is some real SME (subject matter expert for the young tykes) going on in here so strap on and enjoy the ride or exit left and stick to the fishing and hunting end of it….
jeff_hubertyInactivePosts: 4941April 29, 2017 at 7:39 am #1691291I myself, have always enjoyed poking fun at Packers fans and #12 With that said I have to lean with bigpike here.My eyes have been stretched wide open since the Wild thread,if you post a contrary opinion it proves way to difficult for the homers to conceive.
The obvious truth is met with hypocrisy, critism and scorn.Our Minnesotans sports fans suffer from “PSCS”-(Professional sports Championships syndrome.)Most are blinded by losing season after losing season.
Rock on Green Bay, our jealousy clouds our vision of sports.
April 29, 2017 at 8:00 am #1691292I think Aaron Rodgers is a tool, I really really dislike his stuck up personality. It has little to do with the team he plays for, I just don’t like the guy.
Have you ever met the guy?
If not…why do you assume this?saugeye-stevePosts: 293April 29, 2017 at 8:20 am #1691293Have you ever met the guy?
If not…why do you assume this?I agree that Aaron Rodgers is a tool but we shouldn’t just assume it.
April 29, 2017 at 11:38 am #1691309Lets not get in a pissin match over him,not worth it.He is good at his job but a little arrogant.We all deal with that daily.If you don’t like him tell him not us.I don’t think any body on here can change him.
saugeye-stevePosts: 293April 29, 2017 at 12:45 pm #1691312The reason I asked the question is,while I have never met the guy,my daughter has a couple of times….
He is a(paid of course)spokesman for the clinic she works at in Green Bay.
She is also involved in a couple of charity’s(for kids), and he was a speaker at 2 of their dinners. He did the standard speech,did the hand-shaking thing,and after dinner, stopped by a few tables to chat for a bit.
She said he was a very engaging,nice guy who contributed a good amount of money for their cause…..
Thing is I could never figure out how people can know a guy,but never have met him except through the media…….Pete SPosts: 277April 29, 2017 at 9:03 pm #1691364absolutely love this draft. 4 guys who will contribute next year on defense, one likely as a starter, and bringing in what appears to be some rb’s and wr’s that will elevate the play in those positions.
April 29, 2017 at 10:33 pm #1691381absolutely love this draft. 4 guys who will contribute next year on defense, one likely as a starter, and bringing in what appears to be some rb’s and wr’s that will elevate the play in those positions.
Ah…the Cleveland Browns?
Pete SPosts: 277April 30, 2017 at 9:29 am #1691405<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>Pete S wrote:</div>
absolutely love this draft. 4 guys who will contribute next year on defense, one likely as a starter, and bringing in what appears to be some rb’s and wr’s that will elevate the play in those positions.Ah…the Cleveland Browns?
no, actually I was talking about a 13 time nfl champion and a team that’s made the playoffs the past 8 years…
April 30, 2017 at 12:31 pm #1691434The defense got bigger and faster. Love the pick ups. RB young, healthy and fit. Two stud TE’s. if we get thru first four games .500 or better watch out
April 30, 2017 at 1:43 pm #1691439packers look like they had a good draft. Most analysts are widely praising it and giving them A grades.
kabefisherman11Posts: 201April 30, 2017 at 6:00 pm #1691487Packers did good with their draft. The Vikings did good with their draft considering they didn’t have a first round pick. Soo… with that being said what the bleep are the bears doing in their draft?????? That was really weird trading so many guys to the niners for one spot and they took 3 out of 5 remaining picks from fcs schools like ashland, North Carolina a and m , and some school called Kutztown???
BesoxPosts: 590April 30, 2017 at 6:08 pm #1691490WOW I agree, the Bears look like a mess with that draft they had….The Vikes made some nice moves. The 6’6 TE in the 6th will be a sleeper! Have to admit the Pack looks better also…
April 30, 2017 at 7:01 pm #1691499I think the Bears got the only F grade for their draft strategy from some of the experts.
John SchultzInactivePortage, WIPosts: 3309May 1, 2017 at 10:42 am #1691619packers look like they had a good draft. Most analysts are widely praising it and giving them A grades.
Analyst grades are meaningless. They should wait until 3 years after the draft and then grade it. Overall, I think the packers look to have an above average draft class, but only time will tell. At least there isn’t anyone that really makes you scratch your head and ask why.
May 1, 2017 at 10:51 am #1691622when a GM reaches that high for a QB and doesn’t inform the head coach before he drafts is a bad sign for the Bears.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.