2017 NFL packer draft

  • crappie55369
    Mound, MN
    Posts: 5757
    #1691262

    Just starting a new thread so the packer trolls have somewhere else to go.

    bigpike
    Posts: 6259
    #1691269

    Well if you didnt call our qb a douche bag loser I’m guessing the lines would be pulled up. If it makes you feel better read some of the great trolls from viking fans on last seasons packer threads. It works both ways.

    crappie55369
    Mound, MN
    Posts: 5757
    #1691272

    Hey I’m entitled to my opinion and certainly entitled to give it on a Vikings thread. I think Aaron Rodgers is a tool, I really really dislike his stuck up personality. It has little to do with the team he plays for, I just don’t like the guy.

    glenn57
    cold spring mn
    Posts: 11812
    #1691274

    Well he does have a new really good looking girl friend! devil

    Tom Sawvell
    Inactive
    Posts: 9559
    #1691278

    Well he does have a new really good looking girl friend! devil

    It would have been a dynamite picture had he stayed out of it and let the lady have her moment.

    Walleyestudent Andy Cox
    Garrison MN-Mille Lacs
    Posts: 4484
    #1691279

    Well he does have a new really good looking girl friend! devil

    Well which of the two is it? Or which of the three?

    Attachments:
    1. 101210_sterger_xxxx_favre.jpg

    targaman
    Inactive
    Wilton, WI
    Posts: 2759
    #1691285

    askj;ch;hc;JD

    steveo
    W Central Sconnie
    Posts: 4102
    #1691287

    I like the CB pick. Instant starter. Would have liked to see them take a RB but that can still happen

    bigpike
    Posts: 6259
    #1691290

    By the way crappie55369: Everything I learned about trolling I learned from Viking fans from this sight mostly the hard way, there is some real SME (subject matter expert for the young tykes) going on in here so strap on and enjoy the ride or exit left and stick to the fishing and hunting end of it….

    jeff_huberty
    Inactive
    Posts: 4941
    #1691291

    I myself, have always enjoyed poking fun at Packers fans and #12 With that said I have to lean with bigpike here.My eyes have been stretched wide open since the Wild thread,if you post a contrary opinion it proves way to difficult for the homers to conceive.
    The obvious truth is met with hypocrisy, critism and scorn.

    Our Minnesotans sports fans suffer from “PSCS”-(Professional sports Championships syndrome.)Most are blinded by losing season after losing season.

    Rock on Green Bay, our jealousy clouds our vision of sports.

    coffee

    Mudshark
    LaCrosse WI
    Posts: 2973
    #1691292

    I think Aaron Rodgers is a tool, I really really dislike his stuck up personality. It has little to do with the team he plays for, I just don’t like the guy.

    Have you ever met the guy?
    If not…why do you assume this?

    saugeye-steve
    Posts: 293
    #1691293

    Have you ever met the guy?
    If not…why do you assume this?

    I agree that Aaron Rodgers is a tool but we shouldn’t just assume it.

    chuck100
    Platteville,Wi.
    Posts: 2627
    #1691309

    Lets not get in a pissin match over him,not worth it.He is good at his job but a little arrogant.We all deal with that daily.If you don’t like him tell him not us.I don’t think any body on here can change him.

    Mudshark
    LaCrosse WI
    Posts: 2973
    #1691312

    The reason I asked the question is,while I have never met the guy,my daughter has a couple of times….
    He is a(paid of course)spokesman for the clinic she works at in Green Bay.
    She is also involved in a couple of charity’s(for kids), and he was a speaker at 2 of their dinners. He did the standard speech,did the hand-shaking thing,and after dinner, stopped by a few tables to chat for a bit.
    She said he was a very engaging,nice guy who contributed a good amount of money for their cause…..
    Thing is I could never figure out how people can know a guy,but never have met him except through the media…….

    Pete S
    Posts: 277
    #1691364

    absolutely love this draft. 4 guys who will contribute next year on defense, one likely as a starter, and bringing in what appears to be some rb’s and wr’s that will elevate the play in those positions.

    Walleyestudent Andy Cox
    Garrison MN-Mille Lacs
    Posts: 4484
    #1691381

    absolutely love this draft. 4 guys who will contribute next year on defense, one likely as a starter, and bringing in what appears to be some rb’s and wr’s that will elevate the play in those positions.

    Ah…the Cleveland Browns? wink

    Pete S
    Posts: 277
    #1691405

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>Pete S wrote:</div>
    absolutely love this draft. 4 guys who will contribute next year on defense, one likely as a starter, and bringing in what appears to be some rb’s and wr’s that will elevate the play in those positions.

    Ah…the Cleveland Browns? wink

    no, actually I was talking about a 13 time nfl champion and a team that’s made the playoffs the past 8 years…

    steveo
    W Central Sconnie
    Posts: 4102
    #1691434

    The defense got bigger and faster. Love the pick ups. RB young, healthy and fit. Two stud TE’s. if we get thru first four games .500 or better watch out

    crappie55369
    Mound, MN
    Posts: 5757
    #1691439

    packers look like they had a good draft. Most analysts are widely praising it and giving them A grades.

    kabefisherman11
    Posts: 201
    #1691487

    Packers did good with their draft. The Vikings did good with their draft considering they didn’t have a first round pick. Soo… with that being said what the bleep are the bears doing in their draft?????? That was really weird trading so many guys to the niners for one spot and they took 3 out of 5 remaining picks from fcs schools like ashland, North Carolina a and m , and some school called Kutztown???

    Besox
    Posts: 590
    #1691490

    WOW I agree, the Bears look like a mess with that draft they had….The Vikes made some nice moves. The 6’6 TE in the 6th will be a sleeper! Have to admit the Pack looks better also…

    mxskeeter
    SW Wisconsin
    Posts: 3782
    #1691499

    I think the Bears got the only F grade for their draft strategy from some of the experts.

    steveo
    W Central Sconnie
    Posts: 4102
    #1691558

    TBSS
    (The bears still suck)

    John Schultz
    Inactive
    Portage, WI
    Posts: 3309
    #1691619

    packers look like they had a good draft. Most analysts are widely praising it and giving them A grades.

    Analyst grades are meaningless. They should wait until 3 years after the draft and then grade it. Overall, I think the packers look to have an above average draft class, but only time will tell. At least there isn’t anyone that really makes you scratch your head and ask why.

    steveo
    W Central Sconnie
    Posts: 4102
    #1691622

    when a GM reaches that high for a QB and doesn’t inform the head coach before he drafts is a bad sign for the Bears.

Viewing 26 posts - 1 through 26 (of 26 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.